narcissistic diatribe of Sean Pamphilon on yesterday's Sports Hangover in response to listener questions was teetering on the edge of torturous until "Sandusky guy" (AKA Darrell, in Mid City) called in.
Sandusky guy taking it to Pamphilon:
"Well, Sean, I'll give you one thing, my brother, you've got guts. This is the second time I've heard you on the air so ill give you that. Other than that though, all the ..... and platitudes and all of that you've been doing... all the attempts to justify what you've done...I just remember the hurt in Steve Gleason's voice when he made his statement, you know, and he felt like you had betrayed him and as far as I'm concerned what you did was pretty despicable, and you know all these claims that you're making--that you didn't do it to become famous and all this other stuff--listen, my brother, you have gained notoriety because of this and saying that you didn't do it for that reason is really just an insult to our intelligence, because the simple fact of the matter is that no one had ever heard of you before this happened...definitely not as many people as have heard of you now and you didn't make this public a week after you heard it or a month after you heard it...you waited until this bounty scandal was all over ESPN and all over the sports world before you made those things public...it was for maximum effect. You gained notoriety from it, and I find your actions despicable and I think that you coming on the air and trying to defend this stuff is beside me. And I know that you aren't as low down of a human being as this guy that I am about to mention, it's almost like Jerry Sandusky getting on the news and trying to justify what he did."
The laughing ensues and everything Darrell had said got lost in the wash.
God damn it, Darrell. You had him. And then you allowed him to focus on the Sandusky reference and make you out to be a moron for the comparison and avoid in its entirety everything that you had said previously. Would have been better without it. Oh well. Pamphilon went on to talk about how Darrell is crazy for the reference and never addressed anything that Darrell had mentioned.
So, the Sandusky comparison...is it really that far off? (I AM NOT SAYING SEAN PAMPHILON IS A CHILD RAPIST!) Sandusky, no doubt is a monster in worse ways than Sean Pamphilon would ever be, but I can say that Sandusky robbing children of their dignity and their innocence is something that can be compared to what Pamphilon did to Steve Gleason. We've all seen the utterly helpless shell of a once vibrant man Steve Gleason has been reduced to. He is just as dependent on others as a child is on his parents, more so in some ways. And the one thing that Steve Gleason had left, that Sean Pamphilon stole from him, was his good name and reverent status among the Saints organization. Sean Pamphilon took the trust that was granted to Steve Gleason for the making of a documentary of his life , which was to be a sort of "gift" for his newborn son, and abused that trust to further his own agenda, gain notoriety for himself and his upcoming documentary, The United States of Football.
That is what went down.
Take away all of the surrounding circumstances, moral stances that Sean Pamphilon has taken, the influence of the NFLPA, Scott Fujita and Drew Brees and look at what actually occurred. Did the NFLPA ask Pamphilon to release the Williams tape to absolve players of wrongdoing and hid behind the "just following orders" escape strategy? I think it's certainly plausible. Are Scott Fujita and Drew Brees Executive Members of the NFLPA? Yes. Does that make any of this ok? Fuck no. Did the one person whose opinion matters in this entire thing give his blessing for this tape to be released? Obviously not. If he had, we wouldn't be talking about any of this in the first place. If you or I were making a documentary of a dying friend's life so that his newborn son could have a window into what kind of man his father was and someone came along and asked us to further their own interests by releasing parts of this private film, would you or I do it? I know I wouldn't. And I would suspect that you, or any rational and empathetic human being wouldn't as well.
Sean Pamphilon, you, sir, are a dick. Steve and Michel Gleason were the ones calling the shots on this and you disregarded their wishes and feelings for your own personal gain. You actually had the nerve to say, "Well, I was gonna sell it! At least I didn't do that!" Fuck you.
When it comes down to it, I admit that I feel conflicted when I put myself in Sean Pamphilon's shoes. He seems like a genuinely caring person who sees the bigger picture of CTE and the long term effects of football on players long after their playing days are in the rear view mirror. The conflict disappears though when I consider Sandusky guy's comments and that Pamihilon's release of this audio did nothing to advance the public's perception of concussions and the long term trauma that football players endure. If that were the goal of his releasing this audio, it should have been in the context of his USOF film which would probably have had the blessing of Steve and Michel Gleason as well. If he'd done that, the justifications, rationalizations and minimizations wouldn't be necessary in disturbingly lengthy blog posts and interviews by Pamphilon or anyone else.
I just read The Angry Who Dat's interview with Sean Pamphilon and it makes me realize that this guy probably shouldn't have been trusted from the get go to do this story on Gleason and that maybe the Gleasons should have checked him out a little better. Pamphilon admits in the interview that he was only privy to 3 team meetings throughout his year of semi-access to the Saints, and the dude released the audio from one of them. 33% of the inside information he learned was released to the media. He says he is nobody's bitch, but that sure seems like a bitch move to me. A move like that will from now on be referred to as a pamphilon.
I didn't trust him before learning this and trust him less now. He hints that he has more info that is going to be released at some point and that his United States of Football film will be of epic proportions. Well, why didn't he just save the Gregg Williams audio for release in his USOF film?
The answer to that question seems pretty obvious at this point.
P-R-I-V-A-C-Y is priceless.